Economics article review

While the referees are reviewing the paper, the corresponding public discussion platform is open for eight weeks the "discussion period".

Economics article review

This is realized within a two-stage publication process. While the referees are reviewing the paper, the corresponding public discussion platform is open for eight weeks the "discussion period". All comments and responses are published and archived in the Economics Discussion Paper section. Referees are asked NOT to rewrite the paper or to change its focus. Referees are asked to provide short reports that focus on two questions: i Is the contribution of the paper potentially significant? If these questions are answered in the affirmative, the paper is promptly published on the platform of the Economics discussion Papers series. On this platform, registered readers and invited readers may review the paper by uploading comments anonymously or with the name of the contributor published on the Web. The author is free to respond to all comments. Info Review Process Economics aims to allow the research evaluation process to be market-driven.

All comments and responses are published and archived in the Economics Discussion Paper section. In the case of acceptance, the co-editor prepares a short statement, e. With their assignment thus circumscribed, the referees can be expected to provide reports before the six week deadline elapses.

The traditional peer review process is substantially supplemented by a "public" peer review process in which the community of active researchers from all over the world has a hand in the evaluation process.

Economics articles

Open assessment of the submitted paper eight weeks The co-editor appoints at least two referees for reviewing the paper Global Solutions Papers: at least one referee. With their assignment thus circumscribed, the referees can be expected to provide reports before the six week deadline elapses. The list of these researchers is compiled partly by the managing staff with the help of the Leibniz Information Centre for Economics and partly by the author. Info Review Process Economics aims to allow the research evaluation process to be market-driven. At this stage of the assessment our co-editors are not asked to give any reasons when rejecting a paper as discussion paper. In the case of acceptance, the co-editor prepares a short statement, e. The Review of Economics is also highly interested in survey articles on important policy issues. The referee reports are uploaded on the discussion paper platform within six weeks if possible. The Review of Economics will consider papers that are based on i a well defined theoretical model ii an empirical analysis or iii an experimental or iv an evidence-based framework. This is realized within a two-stage publication process.

Second Stage: Publication of the final version in economics Peer review completion Based on the referee reports, the comments made by registered and invited readers and the author replies, the co-editor decides whether the paper is accepted or rejected for publication in Economics. Referees are asked NOT to rewrite the paper or to change its focus.

Authors are free to respond to all comments. If accepted, the discussion paper or its revised version is published as article in Economics.

economics of education pdf

Supplementary Information. Only articles with a strong policy focus are considered for publication.

Rated 6/10 based on 92 review
Download
Recent Economics of Education Review Articles