Parents must require a license to
For example, we do not allow just anyone to adopt a child; nor do we let someone adopt without first estimating the likelihood of the person's being a good parent.
Parents must require a license to
In fact, researchers at Nashville General Hospital have developed a brief interview questionnaire which seems to have significant predictive value. The second practical objection to licensing is that there is no re liable way to predict who will maltreat their children. One concern with parental licenses is that they would probably be based on the values of the dominant or powerful group. This does not mean we should forget that innocent people may be harmed by faulty regulatory procedures. Furthermore, regulation of hazardous activities appears to be a fundamental task of any stable society. Think about it. Paul Otruba Both parents need to be held accountable for each child they bring into this planet. My strategy is simple. Criminals preventively detained and mentally ill people forcibly hospitalized are denied most basic liberties, while those denied parental licenses would be denied only that one specific opportunity. Undoubtedly one should be wary of unnecessary governmental intervention into individuals' lives. I own him? However, the realization that some people are disappointed or inconvenienced does not diminish our conviction that we must regulate occupations or activities that are potentially dangerous to others. These home studies are quite invasive and can take three to six months to complete. A lot of people are having babies, with their parents having to support them fully. Rodney Hoffman When I was a teenager plus years ago , I wished that people needed a license to have children, but I saw no way to do it.
They feared that if they reported him missing, and told authorities about the belt, their two younger children would be taken from them. Secondly, the phrase "right to have children" is ambiguous; hence, it is important to isolate its most plausible meaning in this context.
We know that person isn't.
As a fairly normal adult with the means to raise a child, I admittedly had no clue what I was doing with my first child See " Mothering By the Seat of My Pants " for more on that. Similarly, since people have a right to have children, any attempt to license parents would be unjust.
Should parents be licensed pros and cons
The second my daughter arrived, my OB said, "So, when am I gonna see you back in the saddle? They're skills, And by definition of "skill", These are things that you need to learn, Since you are not born with the magical ability to do them. First, the objection could be a way of questioning our ability to predict reasonably and accurately whether people would maltreat their own children. Having a family is a privilege, And not a right. Probably the most re cent detailed study Saad Nagi, Child Maltreatment in the United States, Columbia University Press, I suggests that between , and I,, children are abused or neglected each year. In this paper, I will argue that the difficulty of clearly. However, that does appear to be the sincere view of many abusing parents. There wasn't even a test at my OB's pre-pregnancy interview. However, the realization that some people are disappointed or inconvenienced does not diminish our conviction that we must regulate occupations or activities that are potentially dangerous to others. Then, in the following section, I shall examine several practical objections designed to demonstrate that even if licensing were theoretically desirable, it could not be justly implemented. As a fairly normal adult with the means to raise a child, I admittedly had no clue what I was doing with my first child See " Mothering By the Seat of My Pants " for more on that. Similarly, people denied vocational licenses are inconvenienced, even devastated.
Alcohol is related to many deaths and alcoholism is a disease that affects many people. The option for government-provided birth control, abortions and sterilizations is a must.
Consider, for example, the right to drive a car. A lot of people are having babies, with their parents having to support them fully.
Should there be a license to have a child
Others may be incompetent, yet pass the test they are lucky or certain aspects of competence -- for example, the sense of responsibility--are not tested. If we also have a reliable procedure for determining whether someone has the requisite competence, then the action is not only subject to regulation but ought, all things considered, to be regulated. This should be apparent given the number of children abused each year by their biological parents. The argument that parenthood is natural, instinctual, and predates civilized society and can continue to exist outside of civilized society seems odd in light of the plethora of books, websites, groups, and so on devoted to helping parents learn to be good parents. Many people lack the knowledge needed to rear children adequately. The selection criteria may be inadequate; the testing procedures may be somewhat unreliable. I'm also shooting heroin, but you didn't ask me that. Parenthood is a more basic and biological activity, one that can be found in the natural world i. The applicants are then subjected to an exacting home study to determine whether they really want to have children and whether they are capable of caring for and rearing them adequately. There wasn't even a test at my OB's pre-pregnancy interview. Society's decision to regulate just these activities is not ad hoc. All he asked was, "Do you have insurance and are you taking folic acid?
If the determination is made that someone will maltreat children, then that person is subject to the limitations of the right to have children and can legitimately be denied a parenting license.
based on 1 review